AI Answer Evaluator for Judiciary Exams (PCS-J)

Get Your Mains
Answer Evaluated
in 60 Seconds.

Preparing for

Stop waiting 2 weeks for mentor feedback. CaseSetu Prep gives you instant, AI-powered evaluation graded against BNS, BNSS & BSA — the new criminal codes every judge will test you on.

Graded against official PCS-J rubrics · Updated for BNS/BNSS/BSA

No credit card neededBNS / BNSS / BSA gradedInstant feedbackMade in India

Murder — BNS §101 (definition) / §103 (punishment)

UPPCS-J 2023 · 15 marks

12/15
Legal Content & Accuracy4/5
IRAC Structure3/4
Case Law & Provisions3/4
Language & Expression2/2

⚠ Missing Authority

Distinction between murder (BNS §101) and culpable homicide not amounting to murder (BNS §105) not drawn. Cite Virsa Singh v. State of Punjab (1958) for the intent test under §101.

✓ Strength

Good use of IRAC structure. Exception clauses under §101 BNS clearly identified.

Evaluated in 47 seconds

⚖️ BNS / BNSS / BSA Graded🎯 UPPCS-J PYQ 2019-2024📸 Handwriting OCR🏛️ Rajasthan PCS-J📊 Progress Analytics👨‍⚖️ Mentor Review Add-on🤖 AI Rubric Scoring📋 Model Answer Comparison⚖️ BNS / BNSS / BSA Graded🎯 UPPCS-J PYQ 2019-2024📸 Handwriting OCR🏛️ Rajasthan PCS-J📊 Progress Analytics👨‍⚖️ Mentor Review Add-on🤖 AI Rubric Scoring📋 Model Answer Comparison

HOW IT WORKS

From question to feedback — in a single sitting.

Three steps. No mentor wait-list. No vague comments. Instant rubric-graded feedback.

01

Pick a Question

Choose from our state-wise PYQ bank or paste your own question. Filter by subject, year, and marks.

02

Write Your Answer

Type directly or photograph your handwritten answer sheet. Our OCR handles the rest.

03

Get AI Evaluation

Receive marks, section-wise rubric scores, missing authorities, and a model answer comparison — in 60 seconds.

SAMPLE REPORT

See a Real Evaluation Report

This is the kind of detailed, rubric-graded feedback you get on every answer — in under 60 seconds.

Sample Question (15 marks · UPPCS-J)

"Explain the distinction between murder and culpable homicide not amounting to murder under BNS 2023, with reference to relevant case law."

11/15
Legal Content & Accuracy3.5/5
IRAC Structure3/4
Case Law & Provisions3/4
Language & Expression1.5/2

⚠ Missing Authority

Distinction between murder (BNS §101) and culpable homicide not amounting to murder (BNS §105) not adequately drawn. Cite Virsa Singh v. State of Punjab (1958) for the intent test under §101.

✓ Strength

Strong IRAC structure. BNS §100 (culpable homicide definition) correctly cited as the foundational provision.

⚡ Generated in 52 seconds · AI-assisted, not legal advice

Try it free →

Frequently Asked Questions

⚠ Every old model answer is now wrong

IPC is gone.
BNS is here.

India replaced the IPC with BNS, CrPC with BNSS, and Evidence Act with BSA — in force from July 1, 2024. Every old coaching PDF, old model answer, and old evaluation rubric is now partly wrong.

CaseSetu Prep is built from scratch on the new codes. Every question, every model answer, every rubric — updated for BNS, BNSS, and BSA.

📜
IPC 1860BNS 2023
Active
⚖️
CrPC 1973BNSS 2023
Active
📋
Evidence Act 1872BSA 2023
Active

In force from July 1, 2024 · All PCS-J exams will test new codes

Everything You Need to Clear Mains

Not just marks — real feedback that helps you write 300 answers, not 30.

🎯

Instant AI Evaluation

Upload typed or handwritten answers. Get marks, rubric scores, and line-level feedback in under 60 seconds.

⚖️

BNS / BNSS / BSA Compliant

Built from the ground up for India's new criminal codes. Every answer graded against BNS, BNSS, and BSA — not the old IPC/CrPC.

📋

State PYQ Question Bank

Previous year papers for UP, Rajasthan, MP, Bihar, Delhi — filtered by subject and year. Practice exactly what the exam asks.

📸

Handwriting OCR

Photograph your handwritten answer sheet. AI reads and evaluates it — just like the real exam format requires.

📈

Progress Analytics

Track your improvement curve, weak-subject heatmap, and time-per-answer trend across all your practice sessions.

👨‍⚖️

Mentor Review Add-on

Push any answer to a human advocate-evaluator from CaseSetu's legal network. Get expert human feedback when you need it.

PLANS

Write More.
Pay Less.

Human evaluation costs ₹499+ for 6 months and takes 2 weeks per answer. We're faster, always available, and judiciary-specific.

Free Trial

₹0

5 evaluations

  • 5 one-time evaluations
  • Typed answers only
  • Basic feedback
  • 1 state question bank
Start Free

Starter

₹399/month

40 evaluations

  • 40 evaluations/month
  • Typed + handwritten OCR
  • Full rubric feedback
  • All state question banks
  • Progress analytics
  • ₹10/eval overage
Get Started
Most Popular

Pro

₹799/month

100 evaluations

  • 100 evaluations/month
  • Typed + handwritten OCR
  • Full rubric + model answer
  • All states + subjects
  • Progress analytics
  • Mentor review add-on
  • ₹10/eval overage
Go Pro
Best Value

Season Pass

₹2,999/6 months

400 evaluations

  • 400 evaluations total
  • Everything in Pro
  • Priority mentor access
  • Best per-eval rate
  • ₹10/eval overage
Get Season Pass

All plans include the new-code question bank. Evaluations count towards your monthly quota.

Toppers write 300–500 answers.
Start your first one today.

5 free evaluations. No card required. See exactly what you're missing — and rewrite it better in the same session.

Evaluate My First Answer Free →